Ilya Ivashka vs Kuzey Cekirge Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Analyzing the recent second serve performance, Ivashka has won 61.54% of points, whereas Cekirge has achieved a success rate of 46.1%. This particular stat holds significant weight when predicting match outcomes, as a strong second serve can often turn the tide in a player's favor.

When examining return game statistics, Ivashka has demonstrated the ability to win 47.62% of their opponent's second serve points in the recent form, slightly edging out Cekirge, who has won 46.45%. For first serve returns, however, Cekirge takes the lead, capturing 30.47% of points compared to Ivashka's 22.22%. These figures are crucial in forecasting who may dominate in their head-to-head matchup.

Assessing their performance under pressure, Ivashka has saved 54.55% of breakpoints, while Cekirge has successfully defended 45.63%. Such metrics are valuable for those making in-game betting predictions, as they reveal each player's composure during critical game moments.

In terms of overall performance during the last year, Ivashka has had a challenging period, with a win-loss record of 0% (0/1). In contrast, Cekirge boasts a significantly higher win rate of 67.47% (56/27), contributing to the overarching head-to-head prediction.

Exploring surface performance, Ivashka's most favorable career surface is Hard, boasting a 62% win rate (W/L 191/118), whereas Cekirge excels on Clay with a 63% win rate (W/L 156/92). However, Cekirge's performance dips slightly on Hard, at 55% (W/L 69/56), suggesting surface preferences could impact the match outcome.

Looking at the player level over the last year, Ivashka has mostly competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, with a 0% win rate (W/L 0/1). On the other hand, Cekirge has participated in the same level of events but enjoys a much higher success, winning 68.29% of his matches (W/L 56/26). Such experiences can significantly influence their readiness and performance in higher-stakes matches.

Examining the quality of opponents faced, Ivashka has competed against players with an average rank of 723, while Cekirge's opponents average a rank of 246.78. This disparity can provide insights into the potential challenges each player might face in future competitions.

Regarding deciding set performance, Ivashka has not won any deciding sets over the past year. Conversely, Cekirge has impressed with a 78% success rate in all matches played on tour. Such a statistic could be crucial for live predictions and if the match is likely to go the distance.

When it comes to break point conversion in recent form, Ivashka has converted 40% of opportunities, while Cekirge stands marginally better at 41.86%. These figures can be integral to making informed decisions during live betting when opportunities arise to break serve.

Considering these comprehensive statistics and comparative analyses, Cekirge appears better positioned to win the upcoming match. His superior performance metrics, especially in critical areas like opponent quality and managing pressure situations, suggest he is favored to emerge victorious against Ivashka.